Check the contract, disruption and necessary nights.
Record the agreed return transport and why it became impossible. Match the necessary overnight stays to the invoices.
Section 11 PRG: accommodation when return travel is impossible, three nights, vulnerable travellers and longer protection under passenger rights.
Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Mag. Bernhard Brandauer assists with the legal assessment of tourism contracts, operating issues, levies and liability matters.
When unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances prevent the agreed return transport under a package travel contract, § 11 Abs. 7 of the Austrian Package Travel Act (PRG) generally obliges the organiser to cover necessary accommodation for up to three nights. The organiser must consider exceptions for particularly vulnerable travellers and applicable passenger rights before refusing further nights. For a stranded group, this assessment can determine substantial aggregate costs.
Identify the disputed cost issue. The result indicates the relevant documents.
Record the agreed return transport and why it became impossible. Match the necessary overnight stays to the invoices.
Keep the notification of particular needs and evidence that it arrived at least 48 hours before the package began. Check the relevant protected group.
Collect connection details, carrier messages and replacement offers. EU passenger rights may override the three-night rule.
Document your request to the organiser, a reasonable deadline or the reason immediate action was necessary. Compare available suitable accommodation.
The agreed package travel contract must include return transport. An organiser does not automatically incur this obligation when a hotel is booked separately and a return flight is purchased independently. Under § 2 Abs. 12 PRG, the circumstances must lie beyond the control of the party relying on them, and their consequences must have remained unavoidable even if all reasonable measures had been taken. An airspace closure can therefore warrant assessment. Simply describing an event as force majeure is insufficient; one must consider its cause, the affected connection, and available return alternatives together.
§ 11 Abs. 7 PRG covers necessary accommodation, in an equivalent category where possible, yet it provides neither an unrestricted luxury stay nor a fixed cash allowance per night. The assessment concerns the overnight stays required, the available accommodation, and its suitability for the people affected. This particular statutory cost obligation is subject to a maximum of three nights, with exceptions applying. That limit does not justify a blanket assertion that every obligation of the organiser ends after the third night, and return transport and assistance still require separate assessment.
Under § 11 Abs. 8 PRG, the cost limitation does not apply to persons with reduced mobility as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 and their companions, pregnant women, unaccompanied minors, and individuals requiring specific medical assistance. This protection requires the organiser to have received notice of their particular needs at least 48 hours before the package began. Verify the content, recipient, and receipt of that notification. Information first supplied during the disruption does not by itself satisfy this advance-notification condition. Assess other claims and any remaining assistance requirements separately.
Under § 11 Abs. 7 PRG, any longer accommodation periods provided by EU passenger rights for the means of transport concerned apply. The organiser may not limit its cost obligation by invoking extraordinary circumstances where the relevant carrier cannot rely on them under EU law. In C-12/11, McDonagh, decided on 31 January 2013, the Court of Justice confirmed that extraordinary circumstances do not remove the duty of care under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 following flight cancellation. No general time or financial cap exists while passengers necessarily await rerouting. Reimbursable expenses must still be necessary, appropriate and reasonable. Check whether those air passenger rules cover the particular route before applying their consequences to the organiser.
Promptly notify the organiser that return transport has failed and accommodation is needed, and request a specific solution. Record your attempts to make contact, the rooms offered, and the next available return connection. If you arrange a replacement yourself, you must also consider reimbursement under § 11 Abs. 4 PRG. Normally, you must first grant the organiser, who is obliged to remedy the problem, a reasonable deadline. You do not need to set a deadline if the organiser refuses to remedy the problem or if immediate action is necessary. Keep evidence of the urgency as well. An invoice alone establishes neither the necessity nor the justification for booking immediately.
For several travellers, link each overnight stay to a person, a period, and an invoice. Organisers should separately assess the basic statutory rule, any particular needs notified in time, and transport-related exceptions. Include accommodation already supplied or paid for, but do not reimburse the same expense twice. Distinguish accommodation costs from damages. § 12 Abs. 3 PRG can exclude damages where unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances are established, yet this does not remove the specific obligation under § 11 Abs. 7 PRG. Enforcing or defending substantial claims requires a joint legal assessment of the travel contract, the cause of disruption, notifications, and documented costs.
Briefly describe the business, location, parties and issue. We will discuss which documents and next review step may be useful.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000