Hotel guest belongings and valuables: when is the innkeeper liable?

If cash, jewellery or luggage is missing after a hotel stay, or an item has been damaged, the question is whether the innkeeper is liable. Under the Austrian Civil Code, liability does not depend only on an express handover. Items placed at a location designated or indicated by the hotel may also count as brought-in property.

Four points shape the initial assessment: what was brought into the hotel, where it was kept, how it was handled and when the damage was reported. Cash and valuables are also subject to a specific statutory liability cap. This article concerns liability arising from accommodation, not personal injury or damage to hotel property.

Section 970 of the Austrian Civil Code makes an innkeeper who accommodates guests liable as a custodian for property brought into the establishment. The provision expressly includes items handed to the innkeeper or an employee, as well as items taken to a place indicated or designated by one of them.

This can cover luggage left at reception, a suitcase in the hotel room or an item placed in a storage location identified by the hotel. Whether a particular safe, cupboard or other location qualifies depends on the actual process and the information given by the hotel.

The rule concerns the guest’s property. A fall in the hotel, an injury or damage to hotel equipment is governed by different legal questions. Checked airline baggage is not automatically a case of innkeeper liability either.

The liability is structured as custodial liability. If the innkeeper wants to avoid compensation, the innkeeper must establish that the damage was caused neither by the innkeeper or employees nor by outside persons entering and leaving the hotel.

It is therefore not always enough to point to an unknown thief or to a guest’s general lack of care. Access to the room or storage location, the organisation of the business, known security weaknesses and the actual sequence of events all matter. The guest must in turn be able to explain which item was brought in and what damage occurred.

If the guest contributed to the damage, the court decides according to the circumstances whether compensation is due and in what amount. Leaving an item openly accessible can therefore affect the amount, but it does not automatically end the assessment.

Section 970a of the Austrian Civil Code generally limits an innkeeper’s liability for valuables, cash and securities to 550 euros. This does not cover every ordinary item of clothing or every piece of luggage merely because it was carried during travel. It concerns the particularly valuable items and monetary assets named in the provision.

The cap does not apply if the innkeeper accepted the item for safekeeping while aware of its nature, or if the damage was caused by the innkeeper or an employee. A general notice by which a hotel rejects all liability has no legal effect by itself.

Anyone deliberately handing over an expensive watch, a substantial amount of cash or another valuable for safekeeping should therefore record the handover, contents and condition. Where a room safe is used, keep the hotel’s instructions about its use and location as well.

Under section 970b of the Austrian Civil Code, the compensation claim expires if the injured person, after learning of the damage, does not notify the innkeeper without delay. Notice is therefore not merely an administrative suggestion but a central step in preserving the claim.

Report the loss or damage immediately to reception or the responsible manager. Ask for a short written confirmation stating the date and time. If the hotel prepares an internal report, check the item, location and damage description before confirming it.

The statutory exception concerns property that the innkeeper accepted for safekeeping. Even then, immediate notice is sensible. Keep photographs, messages, witness names and any police report together with the hotel report.

Guests should keep the booking confirmation, invoice, room number, stay period and time of discovery. Purchase receipts, serial numbers, photographs taken before the trip, a repair estimate or a clear description of age and condition can help establish the item and its value.

The amount of cash or the value of jewellery requires particular care. A general statement of value is not enough by itself, but withdrawal records, photographs, invoices or witnesses may contribute to the overall assessment.

The hotel should preserve access records, handover notes, safe or safekeeping receipts, messages, internal reports and available records of the relevant process. A complete chronology helps separate entry, storage, discovery and possible causes.

Section 970c gives the persons named in section 970 a right to retain brought-in property to secure claims arising from accommodation and meals, as well as expenses incurred for guests. This concerns security for outstanding claims and is separate from liability for lost or damaged property.

Retention is therefore not a transfer of ownership and does not automatically answer whether the hotel must compensate a loss or damage. The specific outstanding claim, the item retained and its connection with the stay matter for the concrete assessment.

If items are retained, the guest and the hotel should record the reason, the claim relied on and the items concerned in writing. This helps keep a dispute about a hotel bill separate from an independent claim concerning brought-in property.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.