Guest incident: evidence and first steps

Damage to a guest's belongings must be recorded quickly and in a way that can be followed later. The important questions are not limited to photographs. The business should also establish when the damage was discovered, where the item was located, whether it was handed over for safekeeping and who had access. This article explains the first measures an accommodation business in Austria should take and which records support a later liability assessment.

Sections 970 to 970c of the Austrian General Civil Code, ABGB, deal with an innkeeper's liability for items brought in by guests. They do not decide every case automatically. Condition, safekeeping, access, notice, contributory conduct and any handover for custody must be established separately. The broader tourism contract and liability topic provides the framework, while the guest incident documentation checklist helps organise the records.

After an incident, the business should first prevent further danger. Broken glass, a damaged door, a defective electrical appliance or a wet floor may cause additional accidents. Secure the area, arrange necessary repairs and record what was changed and when. Before a repair, take photographs and write a short condition note where possible. The safety measure should not unnecessarily erase the original evidence.

If someone has been injured, assistance comes before evidence preservation. Afterwards record the event, people involved, room, time and visible traces. Property damage and personal injury belong in separate parts of the same incident file. A note saying only “guest complained” leaves open what actually happened.

A temporary loss-prevention measure is not automatically an admission of legal liability. The business may offer a safe place for luggage, call a locksmith or remove a hazard. The file should state why the measure was taken and whether the guest accepted it.

Section 970(2) ABGB treats as brought in items handed to the innkeeper or a member of staff, or brought to a place designated or intended for that purpose. The actual sequence therefore matters more than the label “luggage”. A suitcase in a room, a bicycle in a locked storage area, a vehicle in an assigned parking space and an item at reception may raise different questions about custody and access.

Create a separate entry for every item: exact description, brand or serial number, visible condition before the incident, last secure location, persons with access and the time of handover or placement. For an in-room safe, record its operation, keys or code and any instructions given by the business. Mark assumptions as assumptions rather than presenting them as facts.

A handover for custody must be distinguished from a mere recommendation. If the item was accepted at reception, the receiving person should confirm the time and agreed safekeeping. If it was merely left in a generally accessible area, record that fact precisely. The later legal assessment should not be replaced by a form completed in general terms after the event.

Photographs should first show the item in its surroundings and then the damage at close range. Add scale, room, location and capture time. For electronic devices, bicycles or suitcases, model, serial number, colour and distinctive features can help. Keep original files unchanged. Edited crops may be used as working copies, but should not be the only version.

Evidence of the prior condition may include handover records, earlier repair documents, photographs supplied by the guest, booking records and staff statements. A condition record made only after the incident does not automatically prove the earlier state. Together with other sources, however, it can show what deviation was found.

For the financial assessment, keep repair estimates, repair invoices, replacement price, age, condition and any residual value separate. The original purchase price alone does not answer the amount of loss. A standard deduction for age is equally not a substitute for an explanation. Secure documents provided by the guest without prematurely accepting or rejecting their accuracy.

Section 970b ABGB provides that a claim arising from accommodation expires if the person affected, after learning of the damage, does not notify the innkeeper without delay. For the business, early notice matters because it allows inspection, witness enquiries and preservation of traces. Whether notice was timely depends on the circumstances and the time when the damage became known. The business should not invent a fixed hourly or daily deadline.

Preserve the original message, the communication channel and its exact content. For an oral report, record the substance as accurately as possible, the conversation time, recipient and agreed next measure. If a platform or travel organiser is involved, preserve the forwarding record and the original receipt time as well.

Any reference to a possible late notice should remain factual. An immediate blanket rejection can make clarification harder. It is more useful to ask when the guest discovered the damage, when the item was last safely held and whether earlier reports were made. The legal effect can then be assessed against the chronology.

Section 970a ABGB provides that a notice by which an innkeeper attempts to exclude liability generally has no legal effect. For valuables, money and securities, liability is generally limited to 550 euros unless the innkeeper accepted the items for custody knowing their nature or the damage was caused by the innkeeper or staff. The amount cannot be applied without reviewing the actual custody and facts.

The incident record should not say only “valuable”. Establish what was affected, when it was handed over, who accepted it, how it was stored and what was known about its nature. For money or securities, also establish whether the amount or document was actually handed over and acknowledged.

An in-room safe and reception custody are not automatically the same. Instructions about use may be relevant to the organisation of the stay, but they do not replace an individual assessment. Record access, handover, keys or codes and the communication with the guest separately.

Section 970(1) ABGB addresses liability for items brought in where the loss was not caused by the innkeeper or staff and not by people entering or leaving the premises. If the person affected contributed to the damage, the court decides according to the circumstances whether and to what extent compensation is due. The first record should therefore distinguish observations and statements from legal conclusions.

Establish who had access to the room, luggage room, storage area or safe. This may include staff, cleaning and maintenance personnel, suppliers, fellow travellers or other guests. Access data and camera recordings must be handled lawfully and not kept longer than necessary. Secure a relevant period early under the business's applicable procedures.

Record the guest's statements about their own precautions specifically. An open window, unattended luggage or disclosure of a safe code may matter for the later assessment. It does not automatically exclude liability. The connection must be assessed against the actual custody and the full sequence of events.

The incident file should contain booking and registration data, room or parking details, the item description, handover and custody information, photographs, messages, conversation notes, witness contacts, repair or replacement documents and every measure taken by the business. Arrange the material chronologically and name the source. Preserve originals unchanged and label summaries as summaries.

The communication with the guest should confirm receipt, explain the next fact-finding steps and avoid an unverified admission. If documents are missing, ask specifically for a purchase or repair record, serial number, photographs, time of discovery, last secure location and earlier notices. A focused request is more useful than asking the guest to send “everything”.

Before a final response, assess statutory liability, insurance, evidence and the financial loss separately. Section 970c ABGB also concerns a right of retention for claims arising from accommodation and food. It is not a general permission to retain property for every outstanding claim. That issue also requires a separate review.

Receive new articles and legal guidance from the firm with BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.