Travel organiser outside the EEA: when the travel agency is responsible for performance

Where a travel organiser is established outside the EEA, a travel agency established in Austria may also be responsible for the performance duties under the Austrian Package Travel Act. Section 16 PRG creates this effect where the intermediary is established in an EU Member State or another EEA contracting state and does not prove that the organiser complies with the statutory requirements.

The assessment starts with the booking structure. It must first be established whether several travel services form package travel. The organiser, intermediary, service providers and their places of establishment can then be assigned. The rule concerns performance of the package travel. Booking errors at the time of conclusion are governed separately.

Section 2 PRG defines travel services and package travel. It covers transport, accommodation, vehicle rental and other tourist services. Package travel generally requires at least two different types of travel service for the same trip. The actual booking flow and the way the services were combined are decisive.

A travel agency can therefore appear in different legal settings. It may arrange package travel for an organiser, arrange one individual service or participate in a booking process for linked travel arrangements. The label “travel agency” alone does not determine the contractual role.

The offer, standard information, booking confirmation, invoice, payment route and communications should be kept in one file for the initial assessment. The overview of the booking flow and linked travel arrangements addresses this prior distinction. The package travel check can structure the services and businesses involved.

If the travel organiser is established outside the European Economic Area, the organiser’s obligations under section 4 of the PRG also apply to the intermediary. The intermediary must be established in an EU Member State or in another state that is party to the EEA Agreement. This can cover an Austrian travel agency.

The rule addresses performance duties. Section 11 PRG makes the organiser responsible for all travel services agreed in the package travel contract. This applies even where hotels, airlines, transfer companies or other providers perform the individual service. Section 16 extends the group of persons against whom these duties may be pursued when its statutory conditions are met. The intermediary therefore becomes an additional potential defendant for this scope.

Section 16 also provides an exception. The intermediary can prove that the organiser established outside the EEA complies with the requirements of section 4. The provision does not prescribe one standard form for that proof. The concrete assessment therefore depends on traceable contract records, information about performance and communications among the businesses. A bare statement without supporting records may not safely establish the exception.

The organiser remains the central contractual role for the agreed travel services. Under section 11 PRG, this applies even when a hotel, airline, transfer company or another provider actually performs the service. The review must identify the promised service and the party responsible for it within the package travel.

The intermediary assists with the conclusion or arrangement of the contract. Where the organiser is established outside the EEA, section 16 PRG may extend the performance duties to an intermediary established in the EU or EEA. This concerns the statutory duties in section 4. The agency’s actual role, scope of its arrangement and evidence of organiser compliance still need to be documented carefully.

A service provider is the person or business that practically provides an individual travel service. Its involvement alone does not answer the question of statutory responsibility. After a deviation, travellers should record the problem on site and inform the organiser and the contact point named in the contract. The overview of the organiser’s assistance duty during ongoing package travel covers a related but separate issue.

The place of establishment and role of each business should be clear first. Keep the organiser’s provider information, imprint or contract data, the Austrian agency’s details and every indication of who confirmed the booking. The records should be linked to the specific trip and booking process in time.

The performance of the agreed travel services should then be documented. Relevant records include the travel confirmation, service description, transfer and accommodation details, notices of changes, complaints and replies from the businesses involved. If there is a non-conformity, travellers should also record when it was discovered, whom they notified and which remedy was offered or provided.

For the intermediary, the question is which information proves compliance by the organiser established outside the EEA. One advertising statement or the forwarding of a booking confirmation will not necessarily answer that question. The contract structure, responsibility for the service and documented communications must be reviewed. The article on insolvency protection and repatriation concerns a separate evidence issue and should not be merged with performance duties.

Section 17 PRG concerns errors caused by technical defects in a booking system and errors made by a business during the booking process. Depending on the role, it can concern the organiser, travel intermediary, intermediary of linked travel arrangements or provider of a travel service. The rule is linked to the conclusion of the booking.

Section 16 PRG, by contrast, requires an organiser established outside the EEA and an intermediary established in the EU or EEA. It focuses on the obligations in section 4 and therefore on performance of the package travel. An error in entering a name, transferring data or issuing a booking confirmation is not assessed under section 16 alone.

Both questions can arise in one case. A travel agency may have made its own booking error and later also be a potential intermediary defendant under section 16. The time, action, affected service and statutory basis of each allegation should be recorded separately.

Travellers should create a short chronology covering the offer, selected services, booking, payment, departure, deviation, notice and response. Add the names and places of establishment of the businesses and state who was described as organiser or intermediary. Screenshots of the booking flow should be preserved with the date and URL.

Travel agencies should describe their roles consistently in the contract and communications. Where an organiser is established outside the EEA, the file should also contain traceable evidence that the organiser complies with the relevant performance duties. If that documentation is incomplete, possible responsibility under section 16 PRG should form part of the risk assessment.

The further legal review depends on the specific package travel, affected service, time of the deviation and communications. The overview of package travel and travel organisers explains the basic roles. A price increase before departure is a different issue covered by the article on price increases and the traveller’s choice.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm through BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.