Hotel provides a baby cot: product safety requirements

When a hotel provides a baby cot in a guest room, it must assess the safety of the specific product and its own role in supplying it. Regulation (EU) 2023/988 requires products to be safe. The assessment includes the cot’s characteristics, foreseeable use by an infant and the information the business gives the family.

This applies whether the cot is charged separately, included in the accommodation price or offered free of charge. Calling it an additional service does not settle the legal classification. Booking records, model details, instructions, warnings and the hotel’s control process should be considered together. The overview of accommodation and guest admission explains the accommodation contract. The cot’s product safety remains a separate question.

Regulation (EU) 2023/988 has its own product safety framework. Article 3 defines, among other matters, when a product is made available on the Union market and which economic activities may be covered. For a hotel, the actual process matters: does it obtain and store the cot, make the specific equipment available to guests or alter the product?

A baby cot may be offered as a separate paid item or as part of the accommodation service. The economic classification must be assessed from the booking, communication and actual control of the product. Calling it an “additional service” does not automatically make the hotel a manufacturer, and it does not remove the need to address safety.

Article 5 contains the central requirement: products may be made available only when they are safe. The hotel should therefore identify the product data and safety information available before use and organise the supply accordingly. The overview of tourism contracts and liability helps with the contractual level. It does not replace the product safety assessment.

Article 6 requires a safety assessment based on relevant product characteristics and foreseeable use. For a baby cot, actual use by an infant is central. The review may include stability, locks, sides, openings, edges, mattress fit and the possibility that a child pulls up on or becomes caught by a component.

The review must also consider presentation and supplied information. Age, height or weight limits may be decisive under the product instructions. It matters whether the cot is fully assembled or whether staff leave out, replace or reposition parts. A product that looks intact can create a different risk if it is assembled outside its intended use.

Article 6 does not provide a blanket approval for every setting. The hotel should consider the vulnerable user group, room, placement and foreseeable actions. Accessories such as mattresses, inserts or fasteners belong in the review when they are supplied with the cot. A specific safety standard should only be named after its applicable version and scope have been checked.

Before purchase, the business should record the exact product name, model, manufacturer or supplier and the cot’s identification. Include assembly, cleaning, permitted use and any limits. The documents must remain linked to the specific product. A general advertising claim about child-safe equipment does not create that link.

Instructions should be available so staff can follow the intended assembly. Safety and warning information must not disappear when the product is handed to guests. If information is supplied digitally, the hotel should consider whether the family receives and understands it at the place of use. A comprehensible language version may be needed.

Keep the supply route in the file as well. Record when the cot was obtained, from whom, which parts arrived and whether repairs or replacement parts were used. A model change requires a new product-specific review. The accommodation check can help organise the business details and documents for the next assessment.

A safe process begins when the product arrives. Staff should check that cot, sides, locks, mattress and instructions match before assembly. The cot must then be assembled according to the instructions. Missing parts or deviations belong in a hold note, and the cot stays out of guest supply until the issue is clarified.

After each stay, the business needs a clear visual and functional check. Look for cracks, loose connections, damaged fittings, dirt, moisture and a safe position in the room. Cleaning and disinfection must not damage material, stability or locks. Repairs should be recorded against the specific product.

Set out who checks, what is checked and where records are kept. A list with room, product identification, date and result creates a traceable record. It does not replace the legal safety assessment, but it shows whether the specific cot was checked before the next supply. Repeated issues should trigger a review of the model and temporary removal from stock.

The family should be able to understand the intended use of the cot. This includes the instructions, permitted equipment and intended assembly. A short explanation can identify the position in the room, the parts to use and the contact point for reporting a defect.

Information must fit the specific product. A general house rule does not replace product instructions. The hotel should also avoid stating a use limit that is not supported by the product documents. If guests want to use their own accessories, the business can assess compatibility and the effect on safe use before the cot is used that way.

The room position requires its own check. The cot should be placed so doors, heat sources, cords, loose objects and other identifiable hazards do not intrude into the use area. This is a business safety measure. It does not automatically answer every supervision or liability question, but it supports safe supply.

A cot with a visible defect is removed from use. Photograph its condition before changing it and record model, room, date and the observations of the people involved. Medical assistance takes priority where needed. The product should then be secured so further use or unnoticed repair does not change the evidence.

After an accident, record the cot’s position, assembly, mattress and other accessories in the timeline. Preserve booking information, notices given to the family, messages, witness details and internal checks. Facts and later assumptions must remain separate. The record should identify statements reported by others as such.

The supplier or manufacturer may hold important technical information. Keep the product identification, purchase documents and unchanged condition available. Whether a report, recall or further authority information is required depends on the specific role, risk and applicable rules. The mere occurrence of an incident does not establish an automatic deadline or legal consequence.

Product safety and liability ask different questions. Regulation (EU) 2023/988 focuses on a safe product and duties connected with making it available. If harm occurs, the review must also consider the contractual duties between hotel and guest, who influenced the condition and whether the specific harm resulted from that situation.

A safety review is therefore not an admission of fault. Conversely, instructions do not remove every possible responsibility if the cot was assembled incorrectly, supplied despite a defect or positioned dangerously. The actual process and information available at the time of use remain important.

In a dispute, the business and guest should describe product condition, use and sequence separately. The guide to preserving evidence after a hotel injury explains how to build an incident timeline. Its glass-door facts are different. The documentation method can be useful, while the baby-cot assessment remains separate.

Before first supply, record model, manufacturer or supplier, instructions, warnings and the corresponding parts. Then check assembly, mattress fit, locks, stability and placement. Each check needs a date and responsible person. If documents are missing or defects are visible, the cot stays on hold.

After each stay, check condition, cleaning and completeness. Link repairs, replacement parts and assembly changes to the specific product. A model change requires a new assessment. Accommodation records should also show whether the cot was reserved, charged or offered as part of the room.

After an incident, stop use, preserve the condition, document medical and operational steps and bring supply records and communication together. The guide to a concrete hotel inventory claim helps with cost questions, but it does not resolve baby-cot product safety. The next legal review should keep both levels distinct.

Does a hotel have to assess the GPSR if the cot is free? The price alone is not decisive. Articles 3 and 5 address supply in an economic activity and product safety. The hotel’s role and the actual supply process must be assessed.

Is the hotel automatically the cot manufacturer? No. Supplying a cot in a room alone does not establish that conclusion. The business should record whether it obtains the product unchanged, alters it, rebrands it or only makes it available within the accommodation service.

What does Article 6 require? Article 6 calls for a risk-based assessment. For a baby cot, consider product characteristics, foreseeable use, the particular vulnerability of infants, placement, accessories and safety information. A general statement that a product is suitable for children is not enough without reference to the specific cot.

What should a family preserve after a defect? Photograph the cot, identification, assembly and visible damage. Keep booking records, messages, notices and witness details. Medical care comes first after an injury. The further assessment should use the unchanged product and complete timeline.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.